Info Updates

September Info Update

 

~September 12, 2008~

 

 

 

1) Lack of Peace Progress Prompts Skepticism and Debate

 

2) Secretary Rice and Settlements

 

3) Palestinian Economic Update

 

4) Regional Happenings: Israel-Syria and Iran Developments

 

5) Jerusalem News: Future Solutions and Current Problems

 

6) Holy Land Christian Focus: Message from New Jerusalem Latin Patriarch

 

Nearly a year after the Annapolis conference, lack of concrete progress is deepening skepticism about the potential success of this process and is prompting debate and speculation about the path forward in resolving the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.  While it is understood that negotiators have been engaged in serious discussions since last November, the lack of agreement and few substantive improvements on the ground have dampened hopes.  The current debates, some of which are excerpted below, are not new and include everything from the one-state solution to the option of Jordanian control of the Palestinian territories.  They largely arise from frustration that the two-state solution continues to face myriad challenges and obstacles, even while remaining the consensus solution.   

Churches for Middle East Peace has long supported the creation of a viable, contiguous Palestinian state alongside a secure Israel and continues to view this as the only solution that can meet the legitimate national aspirations of both peoples and  provide lasting peace and security.  However, while this may be the most viable and desirable outcome it is not inevitable.  It will require strong leadership by the U.S. and tough compromises on both sides.  It will also require immediate measures to ensure that neither side is taking actions that prejudge a future peace agreement – including increased settlement activity in East Jerusalem and the West Bank.  Both sides must contribute to greater security and better daily life for ordinary Palestinians and Israelis.  Improvement in the economic situation in the West Bank and Gaza, consistent with Israeli security needs, is particularly crucial and mutually beneficial.     

The coming months promise political transition with both uncertainty and opportunity.  Now is the time to rebuild hope in the Holy Land and restore a climate that is conducive to peacemaking. 

1. Lack of Peace Progress Prompts Skepticism and Debate

“'We Are Running Out Of Time For A Two-state Solution'”, Akiva Eldar (interview with Sari Nusseibeh), Haaretz, August 18, 2008

 

"“… ‘I still favor a two-state solution and will continue to do so, but to the extent that you discover it's not practical anymore or that it's not going to happen, you start to think about what the alternatives are. I think that the feeling is there are two courses taking place that are opposed to one another. On one hand, there is what people are saying and thinking, on both sides. There is the sense that we are running out of time, that if we want a two-state solution, we need to implement it quickly.  But on the other hand, if we are looking at what is happening on the ground, in Israel and the occupied territories, you see things happening in the opposite direction, as if they are not connected to reality. Thought is running in one direction, reality in the other… 'What is the driving force behind a two-state solution? The fact that it seems more acceptable to a majority of people on both sides and therefore more applicable. The primary motivation is to minimize human suffering. This is what we should all be looking at…’"

Access the full article here.

 

“One state definitely not an option”, Yossi Alpher, Bitterlemons, A one, two or three state solution?, Edition 32, August 18, 2008

 

“On both sides of the green line and, indeed, wherever people think about solutions to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, a lot of old/new thinking is taking place. Old, because there is really nothing new under the sun when it comes to solutions for Israelis and Palestinians. But new, because after 15 years of concentrated and largely fruitless efforts to solve the conflict with a negotiated two-state solution, we now encounter more and more discussion of alternatives. Essentially, the dismal current status and future prospects of the Israeli-Palestinian two-state peace process are encouraging discussion among some Palestinians of reverting to the one-state solution championed by the PLO in its early years and by Hamas. Meanwhile, among Israelis discouraged with the peace process, the Gaza-West Bank split is spurring consideration of solutions based on the existence of two Palestinian entities separated by Israel (in effect, a three-state solution) or of variations in which Israel and Jordan divide the West Bank and Israel and Egypt possibly deal jointly with the Gaza Strip. Most of these ideas are patently unrealistic. Discussion of them often reflects despair, not pragmatic strategic thinking…”   

Access the full article here.

 

“The only alternative to two states is conflict”, Ghassan Khatib, Bitterlemons, A one, two or three state solution?, Edition 32, August 18, 2008

 

 “With Palestinians facing greater and greater difficulties in their struggle to achieve an independent state in the territories occupied by Israel in the war of 1967, a serious debate has been sparked over the viability of the two-state solution. The continuing Israeli changes to the reality of these territories--whether through the expansion of illegal Jewish settlements and related infrastructure including the wall, or the disintegration of these territories through a comprehensive system of checkpoints and other forms of barriers--and the stagnation of the political process have further shaken Palestinian faith that a two-state solution is the most viable and suitable…In fact, the only alternative to the two-state solution is the continuation of confrontations between Israelis and Palestinians with all the negative consequences this will have on the regional level. There are only two options for Israelis and Palestinians: conflict or ending the occupation according to international law and allowing Palestinians to establish an independent state on all territories occupied in 1967, including East Jerusalem.”   

Access the full article here.

 

 For additional recent articles see:

 

“Support for 2-State Plan Erodes”, Isabel Kershner, New York Times, September 3, 2008                                           Access the full article here.

 

“The Jordanian option”, Giora Eiland, Ynet News, September 3, 2008

Access the full article here.

 

 “The ‘one-state solution’ is full of dangers”, Editorial, The National (UAE), August 11, 2008

Access the full article here.

 

2. Secretary Rice and Settlements

 

Below are excerpts of speeches by Secretary Rice from her August trip to Israel and the Palestinian territories and excerpts from the report by Peace Now on settlement activity since Annapolis that was released during her visit. 

 

“…it's the position of the United States that the parties should not take steps that somehow would prejudice the final status outcome. And, in fact, the borders of the Palestinian state and Israel will be determined by agreement.  I think it's no secret, and I've said it to my Israeli counterparts, that I don't think the settlement activity is helpful to the process, that in fact, what we need now are steps that enhance confidence between the parties. And anything that undermines confidence between the parties ought to be avoided. So, we will continue to press ahead to get agreement, so that we know what is in Israel and what is in Palestine. That is ultimately the goal. But certainly the activity is not helpful…”  (With FM Tzipi Livni, August 26, 2008)

“Yes, on the settlement issue, I think I’ve made very clear the U.S. position that the settlement activity is not conducive to creating an environment for negotiations, yet negotiations go on. We continue to press the Israelis about their Roadmap obligations and to work with the Palestinians on their Roadmap obligations as well…” (With President Abbas, August 26, 2008)

 Full Trip Transcripts are available at: this website

 

 "Rice: Settlement activity hurts talks", Reuters and Efrat Weiss, August 26, 2008

 

"[Secretary of State] Condoleezza Rice called on Israel on Tuesday not to undermine peace talks with the Palestinians after a report found it had nearly doubled Jewish settlement construction.  ‘The settlement activity is not conducive to creating an environment for negotiations,’ Rice told a news conference with Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas in the West Bank city of Ramallah. ‘Yet negotiations go on.’  Earlier Tuesday, a Peace Now report regarding construction efforts in the West Bank in  the first two quarters of 2008 charged that ‘Israel is working to erase the Green Line.’  The report revealed that more than 1,000 new structures are currently being built in the settlements, some 55% of them east of the fence.  According to the organization, figures confirmed by the National Bureau of Statistics indicate construction for the period of January through June is nearly double compared to the same period in 2007. Furthermore, the group claims a 550% increase in the number of building tenders for West Bank settlements (417 housing units compared to 65 in 2007). A total of 125 new structures have been added to outposts, 30 of these are permanent buildings…” 

Access the full article here.

 

“Peace Now Settlement Watch Report”, Report Summary, August 2008

 

Despite the Israeli government's renewed commitment during the Annapolis Summit to freeze all settlement activity, the construction has continued and almost doubled in all of the settlements and outposts on both sides of the Separation Barrier. No outpost had been evacuated, and instead, many outposts were expanded. In East Jerusalem the construction increased dramatically. It seems that the government of Israel repeats the mistakes of the past, by on the one hand negotiating an agreement with the Palestinians and in parallel constructing in the settlements. This construction undermines the Palestinian partners and creating facts on the ground that might prevent the possibility of a peace agreement…”  

Full report with pictures and graphics: here.

3. Palestinian Economic Update: Immediate Measures Necessary; Long-Term Recovery Requires Peace

“UN Report: Palestinian Economy Could Improve If Israeli Controls Were Lifted”, Lisa Schlein, Voice of America, September 8, 2008

“A new U.N. report says lifting the Israeli closure policy and movement restrictions in Gaza and the West Bank is not enough to revive the Palestinian economy.  A study by the U.N. Conference on Trade and Development finds the Palestinian Authority must be able to set and implement its own economic development policies…The report says Palestinian policy makers must have the full range of fiscal, monetary, trade and labor policy tools available to other countries.  Without this, it says, there will be little or no chance of achieving economic recovery and sustained growth.  The report says its economic growth model will not come into fruition until peace between Israel and Palestine is achieved.  But, it says some of the measures could be formulated now and be ready for discussion when economic negotiations between the two entities begin…” 

Access the full article here.

 

“From Zero Sum to Win-Win”, Mara Rudman, Middle East Bulletin, September 4, 2008

“In this period of change, those focused on shoring up prospects for a secure stable future for the region, with a viable Palestinian state existing alongside a continued democratic Jewish state of Israel, must redouble time, energy and focus on those working on concrete practical measures to build and grow the Palestinian economy, and not in the West Bank alone.  This must be done with clear eyes on law and order issues paramount for Palestinians and Israelis alike; critical for the functioning of any stable society; successful business and investment culture; and secure environment…we must focus on economic efforts that will help Palestinian businesses and simultaneously benefit Israeli and Palestinian security; recognizing that these equations need not be zero-sum…” 

Access the full article here.

4. Regional Issues: Israel-Syria and Iran Developments

“Syria makes peace proposal to Israel”, Zeina Karam, Associated Press, September 4, 2008

 

 “Syria's leader said Thursday he offered a proposal for peace with Israel but also refused to break off ties with Hezbollah and militant Palestinians — a key Israeli demand.  President Bashar Assad also said indirect negotiations with Israel were on hold until that country chooses a new prime minister and that direct talks would have to wait until a new U.S. president takes office.  Assad's comments came after meetings with France's leader and regional mediators in talks focusing on Mideast peace and Iran's nuclear program. France hopes that warmer relations with Syria, Iran's ally, could help the West in its efforts to persuade Iran to curb its nuclear program.  Assad said his proposal for Israel was intended to serve as a basis for direct talks. He said he would wait for a similar document laying out Israel's positions before any face-to-face talks. So far, negotiations between the two foes have been held indirectly through Turkish mediators…” 

Access the full article here.

 

 “America's Role in Israel-Syria Talks”, Policy Paper, Israel Policy Forum, July 2008


“Success of the  Turkey mediated Israeli-Syrian talks would promote vital US interests in the region.  If the current US administration is not prepared to facilitate and join them, we urge the next president to do so as soon as possible after he takes office…” 
Signers include: Marshall Breger, Nathan Brown, Thomas A. Dine, Frederic C. Hof, Scott Lasensky, Amb. Samuel Lewis, Robert Malley, Amb. Robert Pelletreau, Steven L. Spiegel, Amb. Edward S. Walker
Full Paper:
available here

 

“What's Missing From the Iran Debate”, David Kay, Washington Post, September 8, 2008

 

“…Two concerns seem to be most absent from discussion of Iran's ‘nuclear future,’ whatever it is: First, what policies would limit any advantage, political or military, that Iran might gain from such weapons? Second, how do we begin to craft, with all the states of the region -- including Israel and Iran -- political, economic and security arrangements that recognize their varied interests and concerns and their often very different perspectives on what these are? In the end, we need to decide how we can perform damage control and create arrangements that take into account states' varied interests…The United States, along with all of the states in the Middle East, has to create security policies that guarantee that acts of aggression will not be allowed to threaten any state's survival while also beginning to build the economic institutions and policies that can create a future where war seems impossible. While Iran's economy suffers, engagement is more feasible…”

Access the full article here.

5. Jerusalem News: Future Solutions and Current Problems

The first article below outlines possible solutions for the future of the city and the second details current residency rights problems facing Palestinian Jerusalemites. 

“How to Deal with Jerusalem”, Lt. Col. (Res.) Ron Shatzberg, Project Director, Economic Cooperation Foundation. Interview with Middle East Bulletin, August 7, 2008

 

“…we already know that a divided city with a special regime in the Historical Basin could work functionally. It is mostly a symbolic issue. Therefore, Jerusalem has to be dealt with as part of a comprehensive peace package…The United States as the facilitator of the process should create a framework with its allies in the Arab and Muslim worlds–mostly Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Egypt, Morocco and the Supreme Muslim Council–that would support a compromise on Jerusalem. The solution is clear to all, they just need to be treated as part of the process and the U.S. can help make sure the Camp David mistake of 2000–ignoring the global importance of Jerusalem–is not repeated.”

Access the full article here.

 

“For Jerusalem Palestinians, Home Not Always Home”, Karin Laub, Associated Press, August 2, 2008

 

Like her father before her, Zeina Ashrawi was born in Jerusalem. Her mother represented the city in the Palestinian parliament for 10 years.  But now the 27-year-old has been told Jerusalem is not her home.  Israel revoked her Jerusalem residency because she obtained a U.S. green card — giving her residence in the United States. So, for a summer trip home from the U.S. to show off 10-month-old son Majd to his grandparents, Ashrawi was only granted a 30-day tourist visa…Ashrawi, whose mother Hanan is a well-known advocate of peace with Israel, is among a growing number of Palestinians — some 4,000 since 2004 — who have been stripped of their right to live in Jerusalem, a city whose future is a core question in settling the decades-old conflict over the Holy Land…” 

Access the full article here.

6. Holy Land Christian Update: Message from New Jerusalem Latin Patriarch

“New Jerusalem patriarch says Holy Land Christians can be a bridge for peace”, Richard Szczepanowski, Catholic Standard, August 13, 2008

 

 “If Palestinian Christians are supported and encouraged to remain in the Holy Land, they can serve as peacemakers in that troubled region, the recently installed Latin Patriarch of Jerusalem said Aug. 11.  Speaking at a luncheon in his honor sponsored by the Holy Land Christian Ecumenical Foundation (HCEF), and later to the Catholic Standard, Patriarch Fouad Twal said Christians ‘can be the bridge between the Jewish and Muslim majorities.’…‘What was once a sizable Christian community has been greatly reduced,’ Patriarch Twal said…Christians leave the Holy Land, he said, ‘to find more dignity, work, peace. I wish them all the best, and at the same time ask them not to forget us.’…His plan for peace, he said, would be a two-step approach.  ‘First, we must stop the exodus of Christians. We must give them more of a sense of cultural conscience and more awareness that they must be witnesses to the faith. They have a vocation to stay (in the Holy Land),’ Patriarch Twal said. ‘And, second, we must make sure they have employment and housing that will lead to trust and hope in the future.’  Patriarch Twal said that ‘now is the time to intensify action to establish an independent Palestinian state.’…” 

Access the full article here.

 

========================================================================= 

The views expressed by the authors of the items included do not necessarily reflect those of Churches for Middle East Peace (CMEP). CMEP is a coalition of 21 Orthodox, Catholic and Protestant church bodies and organizations that work together in pursuit of a peaceful resolution of the Arab-Israeli conflict where two viable states, Israel and Palestine, live side-by-side within secure and recognized borders.

For more information contact Julie Schumacher Cohen, CMEP's Legislative Coordinator at 202-543-1222 or at Julie@cmep.org.

 

 CMEP Home   CMEP Members    E-mail Alerts    Government Contacts     CMEP Letters    Statements

   ~ Churches for Middle East Peace -- 110 Maryland Ave., NE #311 -  Washington, DC - 20002 -- 1-202-543-1222  ~