|
1)
Lack of Peace Progress Prompts Skepticism and Debate
2) Secretary Rice and
Settlements
3) Palestinian Economic Update
4)
Regional Happenings: Israel-Syria and Iran Developments
5) Jerusalem News:
Future Solutions and
Current Problems
6)
Holy Land Christian Focus: Message from New Jerusalem Latin Patriarch
Nearly a year after the
Annapolis conference, lack
of concrete progress is deepening skepticism about the potential success
of this process and is prompting debate and speculation about the path
forward in resolving the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. While it is
understood that negotiators have been engaged in serious discussions since
last November, the lack of agreement and few substantive improvements on
the ground have dampened hopes. The current debates, some of which are
excerpted below, are not new and include everything from the one-state
solution to the option of Jordanian control of the Palestinian
territories. They largely arise from frustration that the two-state
solution continues to face myriad
challenges and obstacles, even while remaining the consensus solution.
Churches for Middle East Peace has long supported the creation of a
viable, contiguous Palestinian state alongside a secure Israel and
continues to view this as the only solution that can meet the legitimate
national aspirations of both peoples and provide lasting peace and
security. However, while this may be the most viable and desirable
outcome it is not inevitable. It will
require strong leadership by the U.S. and tough compromises on both
sides. It will also require immediate measures to ensure that neither
side is taking actions that prejudge a future peace agreement – including
increased settlement activity in East Jerusalem and the West Bank. Both sides
must contribute to greater security and better daily life
for ordinary Palestinians and Israelis. Improvement in the economic
situation in the West Bank and Gaza, consistent with Israeli security
needs, is particularly crucial and mutually beneficial.
The coming months promise political transition with both uncertainty and
opportunity. Now is the time to rebuild hope in the Holy Land and restore
a climate that is conducive to peacemaking.
1.
Lack of
Peace Progress Prompts Skepticism and Debate
“'We Are Running Out Of Time For A Two-state
Solution'”,
Akiva Eldar
(interview with Sari Nusseibeh), Haaretz, August 18, 2008
"“… ‘I still favor a two-state solution
and will continue to do so, but to the extent that you discover it's not
practical anymore or that it's not going to happen, you start to think
about what the alternatives are. I think that the feeling is there are two
courses taking place that are opposed to one another. On one hand, there
is what people are saying and thinking, on both sides. There is the sense
that we are running out of time, that if we want a two-state solution, we
need to implement it quickly. But on the other hand, if we are looking at
what is happening on the ground, in Israel and the occupied territories,
you see things happening in the opposite direction, as if they are not
connected to reality. Thought is running in one direction, reality in the
other… 'What is the driving force behind a two-state solution? The fact
that it seems more acceptable to a majority of people on both sides and
therefore more applicable. The primary motivation is to minimize human
suffering. This is what we should all be looking at…’"
Access the full article
here.
“One state definitely not an option”, Yossi
Alpher, Bitterlemons, A one, two or three state solution?, Edition
32, August 18, 2008
“On both sides of the green line and, indeed, wherever people think about
solutions to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, a lot of old/new thinking
is taking place. Old, because there is really nothing new under the sun
when it comes to solutions for Israelis and Palestinians. But new, because
after 15 years of concentrated and largely fruitless efforts to solve the
conflict with a negotiated two-state solution, we now encounter more and
more discussion of alternatives. Essentially, the dismal current status
and future prospects of the Israeli-Palestinian two-state peace process
are encouraging discussion among some Palestinians of reverting to the
one-state solution championed by the PLO in its early years and by Hamas.
Meanwhile, among Israelis discouraged with the peace process, the
Gaza-West Bank split is spurring consideration of solutions based on the
existence of two Palestinian entities separated by Israel (in effect, a
three-state solution) or of variations in which Israel and Jordan divide
the West Bank and Israel and Egypt possibly deal jointly with the Gaza
Strip. Most of these ideas are patently unrealistic. Discussion of them
often reflects despair, not pragmatic strategic thinking…”
Access the full article
here.
“The only
alternative to two states is conflict”,
Ghassan Khatib,
Bitterlemons, A one, two or three state solution?, Edition 32, August
18, 2008
“With Palestinians facing greater and greater difficulties in their
struggle to achieve an independent state in the territories occupied by
Israel in the war of 1967, a serious debate has been sparked over the
viability of the two-state solution. The continuing Israeli changes to the
reality of these territories--whether through the expansion of illegal
Jewish settlements and related infrastructure including the wall, or the
disintegration of these territories through a comprehensive system of
checkpoints and other forms of barriers--and the stagnation of the
political process have further shaken Palestinian faith that a two-state
solution is the most viable and suitable…In fact, the only alternative to
the two-state solution is the continuation of confrontations between
Israelis and Palestinians with all the negative consequences this will
have on the regional level. There are only two options for Israelis and
Palestinians: conflict or ending the occupation according to international
law and allowing Palestinians to establish an independent state on all
territories occupied in 1967, including East Jerusalem.”
Access the full article
here.
For additional recent articles see:
“Support for 2-State Plan Erodes”,
Isabel Kershner, New York Times, September 3, 2008
Access the full article
here.
“The Jordanian option”,
Giora Eiland, Ynet
News, September 3, 2008
Access the full article
here.
“The ‘one-state
solution’ is full of dangers”, Editorial, The National (UAE), August
11, 2008
Access the full article
here.
2. Secretary Rice and
Settlements
Below are excerpts of speeches by Secretary Rice from her August trip to
Israel and the Palestinian territories and excerpts from the report by
Peace Now on settlement activity since Annapolis that was released
during her visit.
“…it's the position of the United States that the parties should not
take steps that somehow would prejudice the final status outcome. And,
in fact, the borders of the Palestinian state and Israel will be
determined by agreement. I think it's no secret, and I've said it to my
Israeli counterparts, that I don't think the settlement activity is
helpful to the process, that in fact, what we need now are steps that
enhance confidence between the parties. And anything that undermines
confidence between the parties ought to be avoided. So, we will continue
to press ahead to get agreement, so that we know what is in Israel and
what is in Palestine. That is ultimately the goal. But certainly the
activity is not helpful…” (With FM Tzipi Livni, August 26, 2008)
“Yes, on the settlement issue, I think I’ve made very clear the U.S.
position that the settlement activity is not conducive to creating an
environment for negotiations, yet negotiations go on. We continue to
press the Israelis about their Roadmap obligations and to work with the
Palestinians on their Roadmap obligations as well…” (With President
Abbas, August 26, 2008)
Full Trip Transcripts are
available at:
this
website.
"Rice: Settlement activity
hurts talks", Reuters and Efrat
Weiss, August 26, 2008
" [Secretary
of State] Condoleezza Rice called on Israel on Tuesday not to undermine
peace talks with the Palestinians after a report found it had nearly
doubled Jewish settlement construction. ‘The settlement activity is not
conducive to creating an environment for negotiations,’ Rice told a news
conference with Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas in the West Bank
city of Ramallah. ‘Yet negotiations go on.’ Earlier Tuesday, a Peace
Now report regarding construction efforts in the West Bank in the first
two quarters of 2008 charged that ‘Israel is working to erase the Green
Line.’ The report revealed that more than 1,000 new structures are
currently being built in the settlements, some 55% of them east of the
fence. According to the organization, figures confirmed by the National
Bureau of Statistics indicate construction for the period of January
through June is nearly double compared to the same period in 2007.
Furthermore, the group claims a 550% increase in the number of building
tenders for West Bank settlements (417 housing units compared to 65 in
2007). A total of 125 new structures have been added to outposts, 30 of
these are permanent buildings…”
Access the full article
here.
“Peace
Now Settlement Watch Report”,
Report Summary, August 2008
Despite the Israeli government's renewed commitment during the Annapolis
Summit to freeze all settlement activity, the construction has continued
and almost doubled in all of the settlements and outposts on both sides
of the Separation Barrier. No outpost had been evacuated, and instead,
many outposts were expanded. In East Jerusalem the construction
increased dramatically. It seems that the government of Israel repeats
the mistakes of the past, by on the one hand negotiating an agreement
with the Palestinians and in parallel constructing in the settlements.
This construction undermines the Palestinian partners and creating facts
on the ground that might prevent the possibility of a peace agreement…”
Full
report with pictures and graphics:
here.
3. Palestinian Economic Update: Immediate Measures Necessary; Long-Term
Recovery Requires Peace
“UN
Report: Palestinian Economy Could Improve If Israeli Controls Were
Lifted”,
Lisa Schlein, Voice of America, September 8, 2008
“A new U.N. report says lifting the Israeli closure policy and movement
restrictions in Gaza and the West Bank is not enough to revive the
Palestinian economy. A study by the U.N. Conference on Trade and
Development finds the Palestinian Authority must be able to set and
implement its own economic development policies…The report says
Palestinian policy makers must have the full range of fiscal, monetary,
trade and labor policy tools available to other countries. Without
this, it says, there will be little or no chance of achieving economic
recovery and sustained growth. The report says its economic growth
model will not come into fruition until peace between Israel and
Palestine is achieved. But, it says some of the measures could be
formulated now and be ready for discussion when economic negotiations
between the two entities begin…”
Access the full article
here.
“From Zero Sum to Win-Win”,
Mara
Rudman,
Middle East Bulletin,
September 4, 2008
“In this period of change, those focused on shoring up prospects for a
secure stable future for the region, with a viable Palestinian state
existing alongside a continued democratic Jewish state of Israel, must
redouble time, energy and focus on those working on concrete practical
measures to build and grow the Palestinian economy, and not in the West
Bank alone. This must be done with clear eyes on law and order issues
paramount for Palestinians and Israelis alike; critical for the
functioning of any stable society; successful business and investment
culture; and secure environment…we must focus on economic efforts that
will help Palestinian businesses and simultaneously benefit Israeli and
Palestinian security; recognizing that these equations need not be
zero-sum…”
Access the full article here.
4. Regional Issues: Israel-Syria
and Iran Developments
“Syria makes peace proposal to Israel”,
Zeina Karam,
Associated Press,
September 4, 2008
“Syria's leader said Thursday he offered a proposal for peace with
Israel but also refused to break off ties with Hezbollah and militant
Palestinians — a key Israeli demand. President Bashar Assad also said
indirect negotiations with Israel were on hold until that country
chooses a new prime minister and that direct talks would have to wait
until a new U.S. president takes office. Assad's comments came after
meetings with France's leader and regional mediators in talks focusing
on Mideast peace and Iran's nuclear program. France hopes that warmer
relations with Syria, Iran's ally, could help the West in its efforts to
persuade Iran to curb its nuclear program. Assad said his proposal for
Israel was intended to serve as a basis for direct talks. He said he
would wait for a similar document laying out Israel's positions before
any face-to-face talks. So far, negotiations between the two foes have
been held indirectly through Turkish mediators…”
Access the full article
here.
“America's Role in Israel-Syria Talks”, Policy Paper, Israel Policy Forum, July 2008
“Success of the Turkey mediated Israeli-Syrian talks would promote
vital US interests in the region. If the current US administration is
not prepared to facilitate and join them, we urge the next president to
do so as soon as possible after he takes office…”
Signers include:
Marshall Breger, Nathan Brown, Thomas A. Dine, Frederic C. Hof, Scott
Lasensky, Amb. Samuel Lewis, Robert Malley, Amb. Robert Pelletreau,
Steven L. Spiegel, Amb. Edward S. Walker
Full Paper:
available here
“What's Missing From the Iran Debate”,
David
Kay, Washington Post, September 8, 2008
“…Two concerns seem to be most absent from discussion of Iran's ‘nuclear
future,’ whatever it is: First, what policies would limit any advantage,
political or military, that Iran might gain from such weapons? Second,
how do we begin to craft, with all the states of the region -- including
Israel and Iran -- political, economic and security arrangements that
recognize their varied interests and concerns and their often very
different perspectives on what these are? In the end, we need to decide
how we can perform damage control and create arrangements that take into
account states' varied interests…The United States, along with all of
the states in the Middle East, has to create security policies that
guarantee that acts of aggression will not be allowed to threaten any
state's survival while also beginning to build the economic institutions
and policies that can create a future where war seems impossible. While
Iran's economy suffers, engagement is more feasible…”
Access the full article
here.
5. Jerusalem News: Future Solutions and
Current Problems
The first article below
outlines possible solutions for
the future of the city and the second details current residency rights
problems facing Palestinian Jerusalemites.
“How to Deal with Jerusalem”,
Lt. Col. (Res.) Ron Shatzberg, Project Director, Economic Cooperation
Foundation. Interview with Middle East Bulletin, August 7, 2008
“…we already know that a divided city with a special regime in the
Historical Basin could work functionally. It is mostly a symbolic issue.
Therefore, Jerusalem has to be dealt with as part of a comprehensive
peace package…The United States as the facilitator of the process should
create a framework with its allies in the Arab and Muslim worlds–mostly
Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Egypt, Morocco and the Supreme Muslim Council–that
would support a compromise on Jerusalem. The solution is clear to all,
they just need to be treated as part of the process and the U.S. can
help make sure the Camp David mistake of 2000–ignoring the global
importance of Jerusalem–is not repeated.”
Access the full article
here.
“For
Jerusalem Palestinians, Home Not Always Home”,
Karin
Laub,
Associated Press,
August 2, 2008
“Like
her father before her, Zeina Ashrawi was born in Jerusalem. Her mother
represented the city in the Palestinian parliament for 10 years. But
now the 27-year-old has been told Jerusalem is not her home. Israel
revoked her Jerusalem residency because she obtained a U.S. green card —
giving her residence in the United States. So, for a summer trip home
from the U.S. to show off 10-month-old son Majd to his grandparents,
Ashrawi was only granted a 30-day tourist visa…Ashrawi, whose mother
Hanan is a well-known advocate of peace with Israel, is among a growing
number of Palestinians — some 4,000 since 2004 — who have been stripped
of their right to live in Jerusalem, a city whose future is a core
question in settling the decades-old conflict over the Holy Land…”
Access the full article
here.
6. Holy Land Christian Update: Message from New Jerusalem Latin
Patriarch
“New Jerusalem patriarch says Holy Land Christians can be a bridge for
peace”,
Richard Szczepanowski,
Catholic Standard,
August 13, 2008
“If Palestinian Christians are supported and encouraged to remain in
the Holy Land, they can serve as peacemakers in that troubled region,
the recently installed Latin Patriarch of Jerusalem said Aug. 11.
Speaking at a luncheon in his honor sponsored by the Holy Land Christian
Ecumenical Foundation (HCEF), and later to the Catholic Standard,
Patriarch Fouad Twal said Christians ‘can be the bridge between the
Jewish and Muslim majorities.’…‘What was once a sizable Christian
community has been greatly reduced,’ Patriarch Twal said…Christians
leave the Holy Land, he said, ‘to find more dignity, work, peace. I wish
them all the best, and at the same time ask them not to forget us.’…His
plan for peace, he said, would be a two-step approach. ‘First, we must
stop the exodus of Christians. We must give them more of a sense of
cultural conscience and more awareness that they must be witnesses to
the faith. They have a vocation to stay (in the Holy Land),’ Patriarch
Twal said. ‘And, second, we must make sure they have employment and
housing that will lead to trust and hope in the future.’ Patriarch Twal
said that ‘now is the time to intensify action to establish an
independent Palestinian state.’…”
Access the full article
here.
=========================================================================
The
views expressed by the authors of the items included do not necessarily
reflect those of Churches for Middle East Peace (CMEP). CMEP is a
coalition of 21 Orthodox, Catholic and Protestant church bodies and
organizations that work together in pursuit of a peaceful resolution of
the Arab-Israeli conflict where two viable states, Israel and Palestine,
live side-by-side within secure and recognized borders.
For more information contact Julie Schumacher Cohen, CMEP's Legislative
Coordinator at 202-543-1222 or at Julie@cmep.org. |